![]() ![]() While some have dove headfirst and given their works the complete 3D treatment, there are some that do a mix of that and 2D in their productions. While some shows missed the mark whether from poor animation quality or weak stories, there are some CGI shows that are hits in the anime world. Updated Jby Sarah Prado: Slowly but surely, more and more anime shows are opting to go with CGI/3D rather than the traditional 2D art style. These CGI anime not only raise the flag for their own sub-genre and animation style but also prove that there needn't be too extreme a stigma for such a visual approach. In fact, the opposite is true for some titles. While these CGI-only anime aren't as prominent or as well-recognized as 2D anime, that doesn't mean they're not good. RELATED: Evangelion: Most Disturbing Things That Happen In The Anime And just as there are 2D-only anime, there are also 3D-only titles (or mostly 3D). That's why some anime prefer only one way or the other. Even for the most popular anime like Attack on Titan, CGI sticks out like a sore thumb. Because even now, it still doesn't quite measure up to the gracefulness and emotion of 2D or hand-drawn animation. There is still a stigma attached to CGI or 3D imagery in anime. ass subtitles styles support, so positioned and styled subs, or karaoke will appear as dull colored. Pros: Ability to load, unload and synchronize external subtitles on the fly (and 'on the fly' part is likely unique to any other player in any OS)Ĭons: No. So let's write down in detail all the Pros and Cons. Those are not necessary needed for each and every user(otherwise they would be in QuickTime), but there is a bunch of hard users with higher requirements, most of those users are anime fans, and the other people who watch videos in a second language, with external subtitles, and/or videos with not so popular extensions as. Movist is not just another Mac player, set of its features seems to be superior to any ot her player, even on its current raw stage of development. Very remarkable player with unique advanced feautures. Multiple Audio track support - particularly in m4v format,Ĭons: Appaling Subtitle support particularly for muxed in multi tracks More Pros: Slick looks and ability to play multiple formats and codecs without nagging the user for a codec every time. On a scale or QUicktime (1) to VLC (10) I'd give this player about an 8 at best at the time of writing ![]() For the time being though VLC remains the cream of the Crop. I live in a multi lingual household - The subtitle tracks on the test video are English and Spanish, the player playes english only and there is no way to turn it off or even select the Spanish track The option is greyed out.However despite this on desiously undesirable flaw it is a very functional and promising piece of eye candy that could well become my no #1 player if the subtitle issues get sorted for the better. The default Crystal Skin is a nice touch and the players support for multi language m4v is there where it is not in QUicktime 10, However despite this I am seriously let down by the player's subtitle handling. Love the look of this player )1.0.2 on Mac) and its ability to play many formats and codecs without much problem. ![]() Goold looking and versatile player that shows much promise. By Anonymous reviewed on November 7, 2011 ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |